BunkerWebvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 138 | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.
BunkerWeb ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
BunkerWeb is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).
BunkerWeb details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with