UrbitvsZeroNet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | ZeroNet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #1 of 3 in Peer-to-Peer |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 18 786 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | hoon | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit and ZeroNet score the same (63/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ZeroNet.
If you want the quickest setup, ZeroNet is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
ZeroNet is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →ZeroNet details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep ZeroNet, compare it with