Windows ARMvsZeroNet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Windows ARM | ZeroNet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #1 of 3 in Peer-to-Peer |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 18 786 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Batchfile | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
ZeroNet scores 63/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ZeroNet.
If you want the quickest setup, ZeroNet is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
ZeroNet is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
Windows ARM details →ZeroNet details →
Swap a project
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with
Keep ZeroNet, compare it with