Urbitvswyoming-openwakeword
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | wyoming-openwakeword | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #7 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 207 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 1 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v2.1.0 · 30 Oct 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 45/100 for wyoming-openwakeword, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for wyoming-openwakeword.
If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-openwakeword is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →wyoming-openwakeword details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep wyoming-openwakeword, compare it with