Windows ARMvswyoming-openwakeword
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Windows ARM | wyoming-openwakeword | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #7 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 207 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 1 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 30 Oct 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 45/100 for wyoming-openwakeword, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for wyoming-openwakeword.
If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-openwakeword is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Windows ARM details →wyoming-openwakeword details →
Swap a project
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with
Keep wyoming-openwakeword, compare it with