Urbitvsworklenz
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | worklenz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #12 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 3 286 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v3.3.1 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit and worklenz score the same (63/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
worklenz ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, worklenz is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
worklenz is growing faster right now (+104 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →worklenz details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep worklenz, compare it with