Windows ARMvsworklenz
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Windows ARM | worklenz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #12 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 3 286 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | v3.3.1 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
worklenz scores 63/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for worklenz.
If you want the quickest setup, worklenz is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
worklenz is growing faster right now (+104 stars in 30 days).
Windows ARM details →worklenz details →
Swap a project
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with
Keep worklenz, compare it with