UrbitvsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | hoon | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
Winter CMS ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, Winter CMS is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with