Windows ARMvsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Windows ARM | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 7 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Batchfile | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Winter CMS scores 62/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Winter CMS is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Winter CMS is growing faster right now (+2 stars in 30 days).
Windows ARM details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with