UrbitvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | hoon | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Wastebin is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with