UrbitvsWakupator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | Wakupator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 1 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | hoon | C |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wakupator.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →Wakupator details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep Wakupator, compare it with