OpenWrtvsWakupator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenWrt | Wakupator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Operating System | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 28 967 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +454 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 1 |
| Latest release | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wakupator.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWrt is easier to run; Wakupator needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+454 stars in 30 days).
OpenWrt details →Wakupator details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with
Keep Wakupator, compare it with