UrbitvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | hoon | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with