DietPivsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DietPi | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Operating System | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 6 367 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 9 |
| Latest release | v10.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
DietPi scores 71/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
DietPi ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
DietPi is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).
DietPi details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep DietPi, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with