Uptime-Kuma-Web-APIvsZot Registry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | Zot Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 2 925 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +123 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+123 stars in 30 days).
Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →Zot Registry details →
Swap a project
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with
Keep Zot Registry, compare it with