Uptime-Kuma-Web-APIvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 6 521 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +109 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).
Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with