Uptime-Kuma-Web-APIvsWriteFreely
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | WriteFreely | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #2 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 5 276 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +19 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v0.17.2 · 10 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
WriteFreely scores 65/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
WriteFreely ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
WriteFreely is growing faster right now (+19 stars in 30 days).
Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →WriteFreely details →
Swap a project
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with
Keep WriteFreely, compare it with