Uptime-Kuma-Web-APIvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 8 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +153 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).
Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with