Uptime-Kuma-Web-APIvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | v2.18.28 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with