Uptime-Kuma-Web-APIvsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 29 |
| Latest release | — | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
verdaccio is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).
Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with