Uptime-Kuma-Web-APIvsValkey
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | Valkey | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #3 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 27 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +265 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 22 |
| Latest release | — | 9.0.7 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Valkey scores 81/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Valkey ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Valkey is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
Valkey is growing faster right now (+265 stars in 30 days).
Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →Valkey details →
Swap a project
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with
Keep Valkey, compare it with