Uptime-Kuma-Web-APIvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Python | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with