uptime-kumavsWPMgr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uptime-kuma | WPMgr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #16 of 18 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 93 040 | 165 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 246 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 9 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.61.198 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 48/100 for WPMgr, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for WPMgr.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; WPMgr needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 246 stars in 30 days).
uptime-kuma details →WPMgr details →
Swap a project
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with
Keep WPMgr, compare it with