World MonitorvsWPMgr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| World Monitor | WPMgr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #15 of 18 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 89 719 | 165 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 430 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.61.198 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 48/100 for WPMgr, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for WPMgr.
If you want the quickest setup, WPMgr is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 430 stars in 30 days).
World Monitor details →WPMgr details →
Swap a project
Keep World Monitor, compare it with
Keep WPMgr, compare it with