uptime-kumavsWildbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uptime-kuma | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 93 035 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 288 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Wildbox.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 288 stars in 30 days).
uptime-kuma details →Wildbox details →
Swap a project
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with