uptime-kumavsWazuh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uptime-kuma | Wazuh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 93 034 | 17 476 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 287 | +491 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 9 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 80/100 for Wazuh, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Wazuh.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 287 stars in 30 days).
uptime-kuma details →Wazuh details →
Swap a project
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with
Keep Wazuh, compare it with