unopimvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| unopim | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 6 in Product Management | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 11 046 | 89 742 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +2 403 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 17 |
| Latest release | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, unopim is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 403 stars in 30 days).
unopim details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep unopim, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with