unbagrndvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| unbagrnd | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 13 in Image Processing | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 178 | 6 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +110 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.
unbagrnd ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+110 stars in 30 days).
unbagrnd details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep unbagrnd, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with