imgproxyvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| imgproxy | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Image Processing | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 11 161 | 6 521 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +109 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.0.20 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 72/100 for imgproxy, so it is the safer default.
imgproxy ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, imgproxy is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
imgproxy details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep imgproxy, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with