unbagrndvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| unbagrnd | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 13 in Image Processing | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 178 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.
If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
unbagrnd details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep unbagrnd, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with