imgproxyvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| imgproxy | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Image Processing | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 11 161 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.0.20 · 26 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
imgproxy scores 72/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
imgproxy ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, imgproxy is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
imgproxy is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
imgproxy details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep imgproxy, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with