unbagrndvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| unbagrnd | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 13 in Image Processing | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 178 | 93 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +1 259 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 259 stars in 30 days).
unbagrnd details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep unbagrnd, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with