Umbraco CMSvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 2 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).
Umbraco CMS details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with