ResourceSpacevsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ResourceSpace | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 142 in Media Management | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | — | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | — | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ResourceSpace scores 64/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
url-to-png ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ResourceSpace.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; ResourceSpace needs more configuration.
ResourceSpace details →url-to-png details →