ubnt-updatevsVert
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ubnt-update | Vert | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 31/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 31 in Networking | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 23 | 16 176 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +543 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | — | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Vert scores 71/100 against 31/100 for ubnt-update, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; ubnt-update needs more configuration.
Vert is growing faster right now (+543 stars in 30 days).
ubnt-update details →Vert details →