Typstvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Typst | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Publishing | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 56 869 | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +140 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).
Typst details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Typst, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with