WeChat Markdown Editorvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| WeChat Markdown Editor | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 481 | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | WTFPL | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 71/100 for WeChat Markdown Editor, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, WeChat Markdown Editor is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
WeChat Markdown Editor is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).
WeChat Markdown Editor details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep WeChat Markdown Editor, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with