OJSvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OJS | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Publishing | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 046 | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 62/100 for OJS, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; OJS needs more configuration.
OJS details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep OJS, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with