tunesynctoolvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| tunesynctool | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 158 | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
tunesynctool details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep tunesynctool, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with