koelvstunesynctool
Two self-hosted Music Streaming projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| koel | tunesynctool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 59 in Music Streaming | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 17 320 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 1 |
| Latest release | v9.15.0 · 28 Sept 2026 | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
koel scores 75/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.
koel ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.
If you want the quickest setup, koel is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.
koel is growing faster right now (+58 stars in 30 days).
koel details →tunesynctool details →All Music Streaming projects →
Swap a project
Keep koel, compare it with
Keep tunesynctool, compare it with