JellyfinvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Jellyfin | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 58 737 | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 294 | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 1 |
| Latest release | v12.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Jellyfin scores 88/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
Jellyfin ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Jellyfin needs more configuration.
Jellyfin is growing faster right now (+1 294 stars in 30 days).
Jellyfin details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep Jellyfin, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with