trypostvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trypost | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 18 in Social Media Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 766 | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.0.0 · 10 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 58/100 for trypost, so it is the safer default.
trypost ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; trypost needs more configuration.
zookeeper is growing faster right now (+15 stars in 30 days).
trypost details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep trypost, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with