trypostvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trypost | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 18 in Social Media Management | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 765 | 93 043 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 249 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.0.0 · 10 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 58/100 for trypost, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for trypost.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; trypost needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 249 stars in 30 days).
trypost details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep trypost, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with