triggervsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 16 643 | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +256 | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 1 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep trigger, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with