Apache AirflowvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Airflow | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 47 294 | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +337 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 1 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
Apache Airflow ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.
Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+337 stars in 30 days).
Apache Airflow details →Workout.cool details →