triggervsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 16 646 | 53 715 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +259 | +330 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for WindowsinDocker.
If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger details →WindowsinDocker details →
Swap a project
Keep trigger, compare it with
Keep WindowsinDocker, compare it with