triggervsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 16 645 | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +258 | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 33 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for Warpgate.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep trigger, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with