triggervstrip2g
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | trip2g | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 653 | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +254 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 51 | 5 |
| Latest release | v4.8.2 · 29 Oct 2026 | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 51 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.
If you want the quickest setup, trip2g is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger is growing faster right now (+254 stars in 30 days).
trigger details →trip2g details →
Swap a project
Keep trigger, compare it with
Keep trip2g, compare it with