TransmissionvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Transmission | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Bittorrent | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 15 362 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +120 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 |
| Latest release | 4.1.4 · 23 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Transmission scores 76/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Transmission.
If you want the quickest setup, Transmission is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Transmission is growing faster right now (+120 stars in 30 days).
Transmission details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Transmission, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with