qBittorrentvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qBittorrent | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Bittorrent | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 41 214 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +922 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | release-5.3.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
qBittorrent scores 84/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for qBittorrent.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
qBittorrent is growing faster right now (+922 stars in 30 days).
qBittorrent details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep qBittorrent, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with